conflict of laws in international intellectual property agrements

نویسندگان

مصطفی بختیاروند

استادیار، گروه حقوق مالکیت فکری، دانشگاه قم، ایران

چکیده

the complexity and diversity of international assignment or license of iprs and the territoriality principle, makes determining their applicable law difficult. the rules governing iprs, are distinct from applicable law to contractual issues, hence the importance of characterization in these contracts. party autonomy and the discretion of courts are faced with restrictions including competition law originating from national or international public policy. in the absence of agreement as to governing law, rome i regulation, after stating specific rules for determining the applicable law to certain categories of contracts, has adopted the characteristic performance criterion not applicable to certain ip contracts. other instruments typically provide for the application of the law of the country with the closest connection with contract. there are different standards to identify such a country, the best of which is presented by max planck rules which is based on the analysis of a group of elements. since iran is a developing country in need of importing technology, the assignee’s or licensee’s country also deserves attention. the iranian laws have no specific rule in this regard and the conflict of law rule in article 968 of the civil code is not compatible with the characteristics of those contracts.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

International Protection of Intellectual Property

We study the incentives that governments have to protect intellectual property in a trading world economy. We consider a world economy with ongoing innovation in two countries that differ in market size and in their capacity for innovation. After describing the determination of national patent policies in a noncooperative regime of patent protection, we ask, “Why is intellectual property better...

متن کامل

The International Regulation of Intellectual Property

Abstract: The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) will usher in a markedly stronger global system of defining and protecting intellectual property rights (IPRs). This paper analyses TRIPS as a global regulatory device. It first discusses the concept of intellectual property and the need for its protection and regulation. It presents evidence on the wide variation...

متن کامل

International Entry Effects of Intellectual Property Protection

The negative effects of intellectual property protection (IPP) on trade volume have been found in the literature when market power effects dominate market expansion effects. Because both effects will increase profits, IPP will induce entry without ambiguity. However, using product-level entry data, negative effects on market supply are found after controlling for country-specific effects. An ex...

متن کامل

Intellectual Property Rights and International Technology Diffusion

The TRIPs agreement does not appear likely to alleviate any wealth differences arising from the existing North-South technology divide. Open-economy endogenous growth models suggest a dynamic shift towards further concentration of industrial R&D in the Northern countries. While production of goods developed as an outcome of this R&D may shift to Southern countries through the actions of multina...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
حقوق خصوصی

جلد ۱۲، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۰۵-۱۲۷

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023